 |
JAPAN:
FREAKING NUTS?
March
20, 2008
"Through
my cartoons, I hope to convey to people abroad what
ordinary Japanese people think, our lifestyles and
what kind of future we want to build." Doraemon,
cartoon robot cat and "anime
ambassador"

Japanese
Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura appointed Doraemon,
cartoon robot cat, "anime ambassador," at an
official inauguration ceremony today. "Doraemon,
I hope you will travel around the world as an anime ambassador
to deepen people's understanding of Japan so they will
become friends with Japan," Komura told the blue-and-white
cat.
Astro Boy, another cartoon icon, was named last November as ambassador
for overseas safety.
But don't get all cocky, Japan. Appointing cartoon character ambassadors
is nothing new. We beat you to that punch with John Bolton. (Link
to this)
MSM
SPIN FOR McBUSH
March
20, 2008
Q:
When does an idiotic statement with potentially disastrous
international repercussions that exposes you as a woefully
inadequate presidential prospect constitute a 'gaffe'?
A: When the MSM is on your side. Good work, news media!
McBush's
recent ravings over the non-existent connection between
Iran and al Qaeda is possibly the most pathetic thing
I've seen on TV since NBC screened trailers for the second
season of "Joey". McBush, the great "experienced
one" and self-styled foreign policy expert, has
shown himself up as a clueless dipwad and a presidential
disaster in the making. Or at least he would have done
had not our loyal MSM done some pretty quick damage limitation
on his behalf.
The standard clip has seen a lot of play on the news networks and it's usually
referred to as a 'gaffe' - thereby implying an innocent malapropism and no
foul for McBush. For example, beardy sleep-aid Wolf Blitzer said that McBush "quickly
corrected [himself] after some prodding from his Senate colleague, Joe Lieberman." And,
if you watch the standard version of McBush's speech, it does appear that
he addressed his 'gaffe' as lickety-split as a septuagenarian with a life
spent basting in the Arizona sun might be expected to.
But go
watch the unedited version of the press conference instead. You'll notice
that McBush's brain fart hangs in the air for more than 60 awkward
seconds before Lieberman - not McCain - corrects it. This means
his statement was delivered confidently without pause or second thought and
that McBush was blissfully unaware he had been talking errant crap.
So let's dispense with the harmless-sounding term 'gaffe' and consider the
scary reality of McBush's brain fart: it's staggering length. This wasn't
just a fart, it was a lengthy expulsion of noxious mind gas that suggested
his brain had been gorging on tainted burritos and sulphur-enriched broccoli
juice for days beforehand. So instead of saying "John McCain quickly
corrected his gaffe", wouldn't it be more accurate to say "John
McCain made a dumb statement and Joe Lieberman corrected him [much] later?"
It's not just semantics. There is a world of difference between making a
verbal slip, as the MSM would have you believe this was, and being an ill-informed
old twat who doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about but still thinks
he has what it takes to be Commander-in-Chief. (Link
to this)

OFF
HIS MEDS?
March
19, 2008
Dick
Cheney: Iraq
going great, asbestos cures cancer and Amy Winehouse
is f**kable.
Sometimes
people say stuff that is so far removed from actuality,
it almost constitutes self-parody. Dick Cheney was recently
defrosted in Baghdad and plugged in to make a statement
that soars like a retarded eagle with a jet pack beyond
ridiculousness into some far-flung stratosphere of f**king
stupid:
"If
you look back on those five years it has been a difficult,
challenging but nonetheless successful endeavour ...
and it has been well worth the effort."
Soon
after he spoke, an almost inevitable suicide bombing
killed 32 people near a mosque in the city of Kerbala,
south of Baghdad. Just one more small success..?
With "a
third of Iraqis displaced, in need of emergency aid or dead" how
can anyone argue with Cheney's astute assessment?
And with 4,000 of our troops killed, an economy in recession and the Iraqi
'government' looking about as keen to assume the reigns of power as our Democratic
party at home, who could be churlish enough to say "hang on there Mr
Cheney, aren't you, like, totally full of s**t?" (Link
to this)
PASSING
THE DICK TEST
March
19, 2008
"Be
not afraid of greatness; some are born great, some
achieve greatness, and others have greatness thrust
upon them." William Shakespeare

A
lot of people these days are wrestling with their cynicism
over Barack Obama. They like him and suspect he'd make
one of the greatest presidents ever. But then they go
second-guessing themselves and fear they've been slickly
conned by the political equivalent of the Maroon Buick
Salesman of the Month. It's a tricky one to be sure...
but a simple test to determine Obama's genuineness exists:
let's call it the Dick Test.
Cynical people such as myself (i.e., dicks) have long been convinced by the
logical conundrum that anyone who actually wants to lead
this country should automatically be barred from doing so for the sake of
the common good. We are sick of the self-serving orgy that our electoral
process has become and we're sick of egomaniacs treating the White House
as some kind of personal goal or lucrative retirement plan. Underneath our
sarcasm and bitterness, we dicks genuinely crave a candidate who reflects
those old principles of duty, service, selflessness and statesmanship (i.e.,
greatness). But so many of the poltroons and bozos running for office these
days represent nothing of those ideals. Maybe if Shakespeare were around,
he might be inspired by our Clintons and McBushes to add a fourth condition
of greatness: "Some drive us freaking nuts thrusting their non-existent
greatness upon us."
But Obama? Even though his opponents may try to persuade you he's just some
kind of Rasputin who's managed to enthrall us dumb sluts with his fancy talk,
don't believe it. Us dicks like him too and we are not so easily distracted
by bright, shiny objects. He passes our test with flying colors because he
is the first candidate we can remember who is actually worth a shit and who
embodies the statesman-like values other candidates only fake with varying
degrees of success.
The Dick Test also gauges how inclined the subject is to respond to dickishness
in kind and therefore fail miserably to look like a statesmen. But, Jeez,
this guy responds to Clinton's cheap shots about the 'hateful' Reverend Wright
by delivering one of the finest and most sincere speeches since the Gettysburg
Address. Wow. Look at Clinton and McBush... then listen to the "More
Perfect Union" speech. In political terms, it's like Tiger Woods
just strolled onto the put-put course to tackle the windmill. It's almost
as if Clinton's cheap shots have "thrust greatness upon him" by
giving him a great opportunity to cataclysmically outclass her and pass the
Dick Test with flying colors.
So if you're one of those doubters who want to support Obama but worry that
you're being duped, I'd say just go for it. Barack Obama is 100% Dick Test
certified.
Epilogue:
Fried Wire recently signed on at Clinton's Web site so I could leave some
negative comments on her Stepford Wives-style blog. Now I must be on the
mailing list as a supporter (he he he). To compare and contrast with Obama's
style, let me share with you this email I just got from the Clinton campaign:

There may be a competition going on, but has any candidate ever shown such
mean-spirited dickishness to a candidate in the same damned party during
a primary? How sad it is that they wheel out the old "we can't let
that happen" call to action usually reserved for talking about George
Bush's latest proposed affront to humanity and reason? What the hell
is wrong with the Clintons???
But, even now, there still exists one way for Hillary Clinton to up her Dick
Test zero-average. She's gone too far along the trail of ego-fueled, Kamikaze-like
insanity to ever pass, but she could go some way to redeeming herself if
she'd just step the hell down and help Obama win. Perhaps even a C minus
would be in order? (Link to this)

SCREW
HILLARY 2012
March
13, 2008
Let
me be first to say it... It's
the end of the world AND Hillary Clinton's running
again. How much worse can 2012 get?
Even
by the stomach-churningly nasty standards of American
electioneering, Hillary Clinton is behaving like an off-the-scale
bitch. She has demonstrated she doesn't give a damn about
the American people, the Democratic base or anything
other than her own obsessive pursuit of power. With the
tenacity and viciousness of a cornered sewer rat, she's
done more to turn off voters and destroy her own party
than would have previously been thought possible. Why?
"Could
it be that a preferable outcome would be that she engages
in a campaign of total personal destruction of her Democratic
opponent, in the hope of electing a Republican who would
be a one-term president because of considerable age,
allowing Hillary to run in 2012?" (Brent
Budowsky)
"How else can you explain her latest trend of endorsing McCain? She's not
stupid enough to think those comments won't be used against Obama v McCain. I
can think of no other reason. She wants Obama to lose so she doesn't have to
wait 8 years." (Democratic
Underground)
"The only rationale I can think of for the way the Clintons are now campaigning
is that they are running for 2012. They want McCain to win, if they can't. Why
else be this self-destructive?" (Andrew
Sullivan)
Although
I long suspected Clinton was angling for a McCain veep
gig (or vice-versa), I must confess to feeling a little
retarded for not having figured out the nauseating scenario
illustrated above. Man, those Rovian scorched-earth election
tactics of yesteryear are starting to look cute compared
with the brutal machinations of the Clinton campaign.
At least Rove served his own party at election time and
only colluded in betraying it's base after the
election was won. Anyone who gives a damn about the future
of this country can only hope Clinton's kamikaze campaign
implodes pretty soon.
And why are the DNC sitting idly by and letting this horror unfold? Have
all those years of defeatist masochism brought them to the point where they
can't even imagine a Dem beating a Bush-appointed loser like McCain and have
given up on Obama? Worse-than-useless dullards. 'Shame' does not even begin
to sum up the situation. (Link to this)
LET
THEM EAT CAKE
March
13, 2008
"President
George W. Bush joins Arizona Senator John McCain in
a small celebration of McCain's 69th birthday Monday,
Aug. 29, 2005, after the President's arrival at Luke
Air Force Base near Phoenix." (whitehouse.gov)

What
else was happening on August 29, 2005? Nothing much...
"Hurricane
Katrina, a powerful Category 4 storm packing 145-mph
winds, slammed into the coast of Louisiana Monday morning,
bringing torrential rains, spawning possible tornadoes
and threatening devastation to the cities of New Orleans
and Biloxi... The gigantic storm, which as it made landfall
was roughly the size of the state of Florida, roared
ashore near the coastal town of Buras, La. just after
7 a.m. EDT.
With a grim plea of "God bless us", New Orleans's mayor had ordered
a mandatory evacuation of the nearly half-million residents ahead of a massive
hurricane that threatened to devastate the low-lying city early Sunday. "We
are facing a storm that most of us have long feared," Mayor C. Ray Nagin
said Sunday in ordering people out. "This is a once-in-a-lifetime event."
"Once-in-a-lifetime
event"? Jeez Ray, you party pooper, so's McBush's
69th birthday. (Link to
this)
WE
ARE THE ROBOTS
March
13, 2008
"During
a national TV interview Tuesday, Romney said he would
be 'honored' to be selected by the Arizona senator." - Romney
on McBush

McBush
and Fonz's Dad? 'Nightmare' seems too lively a word,
but it sure as hell would be the opposite of a 'Dream
Ticket' if Romney does run with 2008's hot young GOP
hopeful and part-time Kraftwerk impersonator. Imagine
those rallies... the crowd excitement of a 4-hour timeshare
seminar combined with the kind of adrenalin rush usually
associated with watching the farming news report. Man,
I can hardly wait! (Link
to this)
NON-REPUBLICAN
SLEAZEBALL SHOCKER
March
13, 2008
"We
know there is one person who can bring us back, one
person who has the vision, the courage, the guts to
say what has to be said, to stand up to those interests
who do not like to be stood up to." - Eliot
Spitzer on (cheap snigger...) Hillary Clinton
I'm
still reeling from the horror and surprise I experienced
on Monday when I first realized Spitzer was not a Republican.
But at least I can allow myself an almost as large a
sneer now I know he's a Clinton Democrat. (Link
to this)
McBUSH & THE
NUTJOBS
March
12, 2008
McCain
continues his awkward flirtation with the American
Taliban. But is it worth it?
Senator
McBush has hailed as a spiritual adviser an Ohio megachurch
pastor who has called upon Christians to wage
a "war" against the "false religion" of
Islam with the aim of destroying it. Televangelist
Rod Parsley, who refers to himself as a "Christocrat",
claims that Islam is an "anti-Christ religion" predicated
on deception. (Kinda like Neoconservative Republicanism)
Although Parsley is credited with helping Bush win Ohio in 2004 by sending
his flock out to vote for him, the evangelical/Christian fascist demographic
is now no longer the force it used to be. Too many Jeezuzlanders feel betrayed
by Bushco and are fast losing interest in who gets to govern the earthly
realm. This time around, it's hard to imagine many of them bothering to saddle
up their horse and buggies to go vote for a guy endorsed by Bush - even with
the urging of their nutjob pastors.
So it'll be interesting to see if McBush seeks to disassociate himself from
this kind of twisted bullshit in the interests of at least appearing to represent
America's estimated 6-7 million Muslims. Or does the president now get to
pick and choose which citizens to represent? Isn't that like... err... unconstitutional?
It's amazing that anyone even votes Republican any more. After working so
hard to alienate such sizeable segments of our society as black people (campaign
debate snubs and race-based Obama attacks), gays (all that stigmatizing and
hypocricy), latinos (let's build a big fence), Muslims (well, you know...),
the American middle class (read: tent-city dwelling class) and now evangelicals
(thanks for the vote, let's keep killing fetuses), who the hell is left to
vote for these clowns anyway? Or perhaps Republican voters are the living
embodiment of Groucho Marx's quip about not wanting to belong to any club
that would have him as a member. (Link
to this)

THE
CONTINUING UNRAVELING OF AMERICA'S FIRST BLACK FIRST
LADY
March
12, 2008
Go
Clinton. In the name of God, just go... please!
I'm
a big connoisseur of irony. And the Clinton kamikaze
campaign is chock-full of the stuff. How ironic, for
example, that most non-wingnuts have spent the past 8-years
fondly remembering the Bill Clinton era and wishing he
could come back and save us from Bush like some kind
of trouserless Golem. But now we have a chance to elect
his missus and have him back in the WH, they're coming
off more like same old, same old and turning us off faster
than a Rosie O'Donnell sex tape.
It's ironic too that the much-vaunted Clintonian penchant for chicanery and
ruthless tactics turns out to be a crock too. After all, what is all that
hinting about a joint ticket with Obama but a public admission that you ain't
gonna win? You'd think they'd play their cards closer to their chest than
that.
Imagine too the irony of "America's First Black First Lady" now
fronting a timewarp campaign that seems more designed to appeal to pre-civil
rights Southern Democrats than disgruntled contemporary liberals. In Mississippi, Obama
won nine out of ten black votes. Not exactly a ringing endorsement for
America's First Black First Lady. And then, as if the Clintons weren't looking
overly Caucasian enough, along comes Geraldine Ferraro...
Ferraro
is standing by her recent squalid comment that Barack
Obama is "only
where he is because he's black." Ferraro, DNC
high-flier (ran with Mondale in 1984) and senior Clinton
team member, is instead trying to pass off her racist
slight as a compliment. Hmm... This must be some kind
of new political manners I know nothing of. When your
candidate is being trounced, it's more usual not to
start saying nice things about your opponent. But what
do I know?
But you don't survive 300 years in politics without thinking about what you
say. Ferraro knows damn well her comment was intended as a coded call to
action for those mean-spirited jerks who rail against quotas and affirmative
action because they believe black people are otherwise genetically incapable
of achieving success.
Do Clinton voters really believe Obama is some kind of token candidate being
allowed a free pass, irrespective of his merits, only because he's black?
Of course Ferraro and Clinton are not stupid. But they're betting that a
lot of potential voters in the upcoming 'must-win' Pennsylvania primary are.
Clinton strategist James Carville once described Pennsylvania as Philadelphia
in the east, Pittsburgh to the west and Alabama in the middle. What better
time for Clinton to ramp up the subtle racism. Sad, sad, sad. (Link
to this)

MONDAY
MORNING LAUGHS
March
10, 2008
Call
me a sick, unsympathetic SOB, but I think it's possible
to get a laugh from almost any unlikely situation.
Killing sprees, Hillary Clinton and comedy wingnuts
can all yield a titter.

Steve
King: the funniest thing out of Iowa since... err...
Killing
sprees not funny? How about if the shooter goes by the
name of Weenus Chumkamnerd? How about if he was inspired
to shoot dead eight of his neighbors after "tiring
of their karaoke versions of popular songs, including
John Denver’s Country Roads"? If you ain't
at least smirking, you must be deader inside than one
of Weenus' neighbors.
How
about Clinton? How about the girl from Hillary Clinton's
lame but depressingly effective "3 a.m." ad
being interviewed on TV and voicing
her dislike of the ad and her support for Obama?
"What I don't like about the ad is its fear-mongering," Casey Knowles,
now 18, told Good Morning America on Sunday. "I think it's a cheap hit to
take. I really prefer Obama's message of looking forward to a bright future." Ha!
For one final snicker, let's ruminate on this zinger from Steve King, satirist
and Republican Representative from Iowa: "I will tell you that,
if [Obama] is elected president, then the Al-Qaeda, the radical Islamists
and their supporters, will be dancing in the streets in greater numbers than
they did on September 11 because they will declare victory in this war on
terror." Good one Steve...
Really, you have to laugh at King because not to do so would beg uncomfortable
questions like "why is this embarrassing disgrace to human intelligence
(even in Iowa) not asked to resign?" You know King must be playing it
for laughs. (Link to this)

LIAR
LIAR PANT(SUIT) ON FIRE
March
7, 2008
Go
Clinton. In the name of God, just go... please!
Clinton
is now showing she can lie and self-aggrandize with the best worst
of them. It's almost as if she's a Republican.
Andrew Sullivan, everyone's favorite bald catholic homosexual conservative,
refers us to a Chicago Tribune article that refutes some of her most massively
stupid claims about her own experience and achievements:
"Pressed
in a CNN interview this week for specific examples of
foreign policy experience that has prepared her for an
international crisis, Clinton claimed that she "helped
to bring peace" to Northern Ireland and negotiated
with Macedonia to open up its border to refugees from
Kosovo."
Brought
peace to Northern Ireland??? Err... right, of course
you did, Hillary. And with reference to Macedonia, the
article points out that "The Macedonian government
opened its border to refugees the day before Clinton
arrived to meet with government leaders."
Sullivan adds that Clinton has "no executive experience. She has less
legislative experience than Obama. And she has not just exaggerated, but
flat-out lied, about her non-achievements." Pass that to a Hillary supporter.
Obama is ahead on the popular vote and on pledged delegates. If the DNC does
have some kind of self-destructive brain fart and, via those 'Super delegates',
passes the torch to this divisive, egomaniacal, fraudulent, irrelevant and
outmoded shyster it might just be the saddest day for democracy since the
call-off of the Florida recount. (Link to this)
BUNCH
OF C***S!
March
7, 2008
How
do you undermine the success of a candidate who is
inconveniently popular? Simple. Deploy the "C" word...
Google
yields 539,000 hits for the keywords 'Obama, cult' (E.G., "The
Obama Cult of Nonthreatening Personality", "The
Mystery of the Obama Cult", "The
Obama Cult: Both Ugly And Beautiful").
Don't these 539,000 jerkwads understand the implications of using such a
lazy, catch-all slur? Don't they worry there might be repercussions in dismissing
the millions of voters backing America's most popular candidate as a bunch
of beguiled and delusional airheads? Hopefully, the tactic will backfire
and generate further lost credibility for themselves and their brand of screechy
news-o-tainment. They're not taking potshots at a few voiceless wackjobs
when they toss around the 'c' word, they're picking on what currently constitutes
a majority of American people. So brave (or stupid) words indeed.
There's a lot of us "Obama cultists" out here and our brains-to-candidate
ratio is pretty impressive. The media Obama-haters would be better off insulting
Clinton's base of black-hating 'rojonecks' or McCain's base of everybody-hating
crackers than trifling with America's intelligentsia who have thrown in their
lot with Obama. Am I going too far? Well, do you know anyone in sound mind
and without party agenda who would genuinely prefer Clinton
or, God forbid, McBush over Obama for president?
(OK... maybe I've gone too far. Boasting about smarts is distinctly unAmerican
these days. Let's get back to the cult issue before my email firing squad
suggests another one-way ticket to France where gross stuff like escargot,
hirsute underarms and thinking are appreciated.)
The 'C' Word continued...
Perhaps that old aphorism about history repeating itself is not so much of
a meaningless cliché. Camille
Paglia reports on the primaries for Salon:
"Although
the chaotically open primary has given Candidate A a
numerical victory, Candidate B will surely be the party
nominee in this year's general election. Candidate A's cult
followers in the Northeastern media still look
stunned from his embarrassing loss to Candidate B last
weekend. What fun it was to watch them squirm and pout
as they tried by rote to blame Candidate A's defeat on "negative
ads"..."
But
she's not talking about the 2008 primaries. It's the
2000 Republican primary and Candidate A is John McCain.
Candidate B? What Paglia refers to as that "inarticulate
lightweight" Texas Governor. Not sure if irony is
the appropriate word, but it's certainly weird to see
Obama's campaign following the same trajectory and suffering
the same cultic smears today as McCain's did back in
2000.
But for Obama "Cultists" Paglia offers a shred of comfort from
8-years thither. Apparently "Like it or not, with few exceptions, the
taller presidential candidate always wins." (N.B: Obama: 6'2",
McBush: 5'7") (Link to this)
HALL
AND OATES AND HILLARY: SOUNDTRACK FOR THE BEIGE REVOLUTION
March
6, 2008
Why
is Clinton still there? Why are we so determined to reject
change? What do Hall and Oates have to do with anything?

Don't
get me wrong, I think "Say No Go" was a great
song. Even though Hall and Oates' brand of nerdish pop-soul
is a text-book example of muzak for folks who don't 'get'
music and are turned off by passion and edginess, it's
hard to hate them cuz they were just so infectious. Kinda
like the Three's Company sig tune, athlete's foot or
Snoop Dogg's made-up words.
Hall and Oates were the soundtrack to sales office holiday parties. They
made songs for cheap-suited bald guys to knead office administrator rear
end to; tunes for toner salesmen to hum between bouts of bored roadside masturbation
in their company Hyundais; for people who choose beige because taupe is too
edgy; for holiday drinkers who get wasted bi-annually and robot dance their
way through Tina Turner's entire back catalog; for people who lock their
doors when they pass anyone black and under 40; for people who always ask
for mild sauce... In short, Hall and Oates are for people who fear the activity
of living and treat passion with suspicion. They are for people who prefer
to live out their years in comfy states of non-committal leaving every envelope
unpushed and every thought firmly within the box.
So where am I going with this Hall and Oates crap? It's my analogy for the
otherwise inexplicable phenomenon of Hillary Clinton's enduring popularity.
She is the political equivalent of Hall and Oates: bland, well-executed fodder
for people who are turned off by genuine passion. Sure, she can turn out
some catchy tunes. But they are completely devoid of edge, grit, soul, innovation,
risk or anything else that makes things interesting. Clinton's politics is
muzak for people who don't like politics.
You vote McCain because you don't care if the whole world goes to hell as
long as you pay lower taxes. You vote Obama if you're morally opposed to
injustice and are impatient for change. You vote Clinton because she cried
at a rally once. Oh, that and you "weally, weally want a woman to be
president." While McBush and Obama represent the people with passionately-held,
deep-rooted political beliefs (messed-up or not), Clinton represents only
the triumph of vacuousness.
I respect McCain more than Clinton. There, I said it. With all his warmongering
bluster, Bushco-backing and unashamed nastiness, he is at least sincere about
his insincerity. And, however foul, icky and injurious to the common good
they might be, McBush's beliefs have substance. What does Clinton represent
that's worthy of respect? The ability to cry on cue like a Tiny Tears doll?
The ability to pass off days spent choosing drapes for the White House while
her husband got oral from skanks as experience?
She might be presenting her recent wins in Texas and Ohio as victories, but
she's lost the war. She's more likely to run as McBush's veep than beat him.
So why is the DNC betraying the people again by allowing the pointless in-fighting
to continue? Grow them cojones back Howard and put a stop to it. Let the
people who actually care about music choose the next song instead of ceding
momentum to those Clinton-loving clones clamoring for Hall and Oates. Our
ears are bleeding from 8 years of Bush-Cheney Death Metal and "Say No
Go" ain't gonna cut it. (Link
to this)

TROLLING
FOR 'MERIKA
March
1, 2008

Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad has a blog. Style-wise, it's not exactly
Rolling Stone - more Hewell Hauser popping tranquilizers
with the guy who writes IRS forms - but the comments
section is a weird trip.
Amazingly, the president of Iran doesn't believe in screening (take a tip
Townhall.com, you bunch of pussies!), so there's a great opportunity here
for American cuntservatives to do their bit for international relations and
speak directly to a foreign head of state with whom they share many misunderstandings
and disagreements. Here are some choice comments by American visitors that
should make every patriot swell with pride:
"Shut
up please, would you? I get headache reading your nonsense
stuff."
"I hope someone puts a bullet in your head very soon."
"Die slow."
"You are a n***er."
Interesting
to see Obama's ideas about talking to our 'enemies' gaining
exceptance on the right. (Link
to this)
Back
Pages
Fried
Wire Policy and Disclaimer | Hatemail | Hmm... | Fanmail
|
 |